Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$SZK Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- usglx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wfddx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Wells Fargo Discovery Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pyusx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Payden U.S. Government Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfcix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pogbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pogcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- psmm
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Moderately Conservative Multi-Asset Allocation ETF
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- rfdi
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- rffc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »