Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$SZEAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- emlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nerax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hahcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sihsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dafrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cpctx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sainx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhobx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Global High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mainx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Matthews Asia Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Global High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pycex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hxiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Harvest Asian Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pkcbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jassx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class S
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cpucx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AAM/Insight Select Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »