Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
John Hancock Regional Bank Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
PIMCO Short Duration Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Hartford International Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund Class Z
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Eagle Growth and Income Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 3.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam RetirementReady 2045 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2040 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
AllianzGI AI & Tech Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
William Blair Emerging Markets Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2035 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Delaware Tax-Free USA Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2026 Adam Fortuna
Site Map