• pgvfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Polaris Global Value Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• eto
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• phszx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• sgidx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• faugx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

Franklin Adjustable U.S. Government Securities Fund Class A1

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fcyix
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Fidelity® Select Industrials Portfolio

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• figtx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 2-5 Year Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hgxix
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• spxs
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• spxt
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• hmvtx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• flrmx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• hrlyx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• twm
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• htd
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

Expenses: 2.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• hylv
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

IQ S&P High Yield Low Volatility Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ibd
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• frak
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Energy

VanEck Vectors Unconventional Oil & Gas ETF

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

• iecs
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Consumer Defensive

iShares Evolved U.S. Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

• tedsx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »