SSICX : Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Class C

SSICX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

SSICX

Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SSICX vs EISDX

13% FI Score
  • eisdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs MGPIX

13% FI Score
  • mgpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs MLSCX

13% FI Score
  • mlscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs MSURX

13% FI Score
  • msurx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs NEOMX

13% FI Score
  • neomx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs ACVVX

13% FI Score
  • acvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 3.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs OBSOX

13% FI Score
  • obsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs AGFQX

13% FI Score
  • agfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs NARCX

13% FI Score
  • narcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs APJAX

13% FI Score
  • apjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs APMAX

13% FI Score
  • apmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs ARMAX

13% FI Score
  • armax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

AllianzGI Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs PSPFX

13% FI Score
  • pspfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs OBEMX

13% FI Score
  • obemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Oberweis Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs SPABX

13% FI Score
  • spabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

SilverPepper Merger Arbitrage Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs ATVAX

13% FI Score
  • atvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Athena Behavioral Tactical Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SSICX vs AVSAX

13% FI Score
  • avsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo