Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$SPMD Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ugeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA Global Equity Income Fund Fund Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- valix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Value Line Capital Appreciation Fund, Inc. Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dxrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bear 2X Fund
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- ecbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Eaton Vance Core Plus Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ecdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ecow
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- ekwax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- wggnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- epv
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- eqiax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- blcn
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Reality Shares Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- evgbc
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fbdix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- figix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 2-5 Year Service Shares
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fitsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Federated Government Income Trust Service Shares
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flm
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fmiex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wasatch Global Value Fund⢠Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- frsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »