Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$SPEGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mnncx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sggcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- limax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Lateef Focused Sustainable Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- chaix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Chase Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tihgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Investment House Growth Fund
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvrcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rwgfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
RiverPark/Wedgewood Fund Class Retail
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Core Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- otpix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »