Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$SKSIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pllax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Principal SmallCap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jscbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
John Hancock II Small Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gsscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bdscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ousm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rytfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Royce Total Return Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- asqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
American Century Small Company Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ewsc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pckcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Small Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »