SISSX : Virtus Seix Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

SISSX is a Alternative Market Short with MODERATE fees.

SISSX

Virtus Seix Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

FI Score

29 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SISSX vs OEMNX

21% FI Score
  • oemnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs ARSKX

21% FI Score
  • arskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Archer Stock Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs MHFCX

21% FI Score
  • mhfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs PCI

21% FI Score
  • pci
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Dynamic Credit and Mortgage Income Fund

Expenses: 4.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs CRIEX

21% FI Score
  • criex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

CRM All Cap Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs NCBVX

21% FI Score
  • ncbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs NUIAX

21% FI Score
  • nuiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nuveen Santa Barbara International Dividend Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs SLTMX

21% FI Score
  • sltmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Virtus Seix U.S. Mortgage Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs BXIAX

21% FI Score
  • bxiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs FFEU

21% FI Score
  • ffeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs GCE

21% FI Score
  • gce
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Claymore CEF GS Connect ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs TCSHX

21% FI Score
  • tcshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs RSIVX

21% FI Score
  • rsivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RiverPark Strategic Income Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs BCIIX

21% FI Score
  • bciix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs BCMSX

21% FI Score
  • bcmsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Brown Capital Management Mid Company Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs SMDPX

21% FI Score
  • smdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Sterling Capital SMID Opportunities Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs SMCP

21% FI Score
  • smcp
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs QBDSX

21% FI Score
  • qbdsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Quantified Managed Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs HDCAX

21% FI Score
  • hdcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rational Equity Armor Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo