SISSX : Virtus Seix Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

SISSX is a Alternative Market Short with MODERATE fees.

SISSX

Virtus Seix Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

FI Score

29 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SISSX vs FTSIX

23% FI Score
  • ftsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs TLVOX

23% FI Score
  • tlvox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thrivent Low Volatility Equity Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs MINEX

23% FI Score
  • minex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay International Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs OKMUX

22% FI Score
  • okmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs GTNDX

22% FI Score
  • gtndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs AADGX

22% FI Score
  • aadgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Aasgard Dividend Growth Small & Mid-Cap Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs CUHCX

22% FI Score
  • cuhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs RGNCX

22% FI Score
  • rgncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs CVISX

22% FI Score
  • cvisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Causeway International Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs CIGCX

22% FI Score
  • cigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs GLNAX

22% FI Score
  • glnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs HQBCX

22% FI Score
  • hqbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs FPPAX

22% FI Score
  • fppax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs ECHSX

22% FI Score
  • echsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs BMPCX

22% FI Score
  • bmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock US Mortgage Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs APGRX

22% FI Score
  • apgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SISSX vs AFLEX

22% FI Score
  • aflex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo