Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$SEEGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ptwcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison 20/20 Focus Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pbqfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adcvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rycox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Core Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- staex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wbgsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
William Blair Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rpxix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
RiverPark Large Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dveax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Delaware Select Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »