SEECX : Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

SEECX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend index fund with MODERATE fees.

SEECX

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEECX vs FJPNX

42% FI Score
  • fjpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Fidelity® Japan Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs HLMRX

42% FI Score
  • hlmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio Institutional

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FLBL

42% FI Score
  • flbl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs HRLTX

42% FI Score
  • hrltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FNGO

42% FI Score
  • fngo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs HSNAX

42% FI Score
  • hsnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

The Hartford Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs HWHAX

42% FI Score
  • hwhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs HYSAX

42% FI Score
  • hysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FRFZX

42% FI Score
  • frfzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FRUSX

42% FI Score
  • frusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Franklin Utilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FSHCX

42% FI Score
  • fshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Fidelity® Select Health Care Services Portfolio

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs TEQAX

42% FI Score
  • teqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FSTCX

42% FI Score
  • fstcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Fidelity® Select Telecommunications Portfolio

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FTXH

42% FI Score
  • ftxh
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FXR

42% FI Score
  • fxr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs GEGCX

42% FI Score
  • gegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs GERAX

42% FI Score
  • gerax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs GMZ

42% FI Score
  • gmz
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs MEQFX

42% FI Score
  • meqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG FQ Long-Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs NSTCX

42% FI Score
  • nstcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo