SEECX : Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

SEECX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend index fund with MODERATE fees.

SEECX

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SEECX vs JHMT

43% FI Score
  • jhmt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

John Hancock Multifactor Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs BSCE

43% FI Score
  • bsce
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares (R) 2023 USD Emerging Markets Debt ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs ENYIX

43% FI Score
  • enyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs IHAK

43% FI Score
  • ihak
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs JOGIX

43% FI Score
  • jogix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs ACV

43% FI Score
  • acv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AllianzGI Diversified Income & Convertible Fund

Expenses: 3.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs CHW

43% FI Score
  • chw
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund

Expenses: 3.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs CGO

43% FI Score
  • cgo
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Total Return Fund

Expenses: 3.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs JPMF

43% FI Score
  • jpmf
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Future

JPMorgan Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs JTTCX

43% FI Score
  • jttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2020 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs JRI

43% FI Score
  • jri
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs COW

43% FI Score
  • cow
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs JVXIX

43% FI Score
  • jvxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Virtus Vontobel Foreign Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FEMS

43% FI Score
  • fems
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs COCVX

43% FI Score
  • cocvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Overseas Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FLTFX

43% FI Score
  • fltfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2055 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs IVWCX

43% FI Score
  • ivwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

IVA Worldwide Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs FOOLX

43% FI Score
  • foolx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFAM Global Opportunities Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs JHMI

43% FI Score
  • jhmi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

John Hancock Multifactor Industrials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SEECX vs HPI

43% FI Score
  • hpi
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

John Hancock Preferred Income Fund

Expenses: 2.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo