Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$SEATX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ineax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- etsix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fam
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust/Aberdeen Global Opportunity Income Fund
Expenses: 2.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ivh
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 3.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- acp
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies Fund
Expenses: 3.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »