SCO : ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil

SCO is a Alternative Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

SCO

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil

FI Score

43 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCO vs ACXAX

  • acxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Catalyst Multi-Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs HNRCX

  • hnrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs ICLEX

  • iclex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

ICON Consumer Staples Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs IHICX

  • ihicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Emerging Market Debt Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs KIRCX

  • kircx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Salient Global Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs OSFCX

  • osfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs NYSAX

  • nysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nysa Fund

Expenses: 4.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs PAABX

  • paabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Advisors Fund Inc. - Balanced Fund

Expenses: 6.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs PAMVX

  • pamvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Pacific Advisors Mid Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 6.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCO vs OGYCX

  • ogycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo