• fam
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

First Trust/Aberdeen Global Opportunity Income Fund

Expenses: 2.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• jqc
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund

Expenses: 3.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gilfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• jro
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• dcf
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

BNY Mellon Alcentra Global Credit Income 2024 Target Term Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ecibx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pysgx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Payden Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ivh
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ineax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Columbia High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hfro
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Highland Income Fund

Expenses: 3.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »