RYSHX : Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

RYSHX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYSHX

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYSHX vs LMSCX

25% FI Score
  • lmscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NWHKX

25% FI Score
  • nwhkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs ATMAX

25% FI Score
  • atmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs CDIVX

25% FI Score
  • cdivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Copeland Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs PAJZX

25% FI Score
  • pajzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs GHACX

25% FI Score
  • ghacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck Global Hard Assets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs CSMVX

25% FI Score
  • csmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Congress Small Cap Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs EMEAX

25% FI Score
  • emeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs CCACX

25% FI Score
  • ccacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Calvert Mid-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs FUSGX

25% FI Score
  • fusgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs LVAFX

25% FI Score
  • lvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs DNFGX

25% FI Score
  • dnfgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs EACOX

25% FI Score
  • eacox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs DMBCX

25% FI Score
  • dmbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs TIHGX

25% FI Score
  • tihgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

The Investment House Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs LTUCX

25% FI Score
  • ltucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs GTAJX

25% FI Score
  • gtajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs CUSIX

25% FI Score
  • cusix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NWHWX

25% FI Score
  • nwhwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs BAEDX

25% FI Score
  • baedx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Emerging Markets Flexible Dynamic Bond Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo