RYMKX : Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund Class H

RYMKX is a Alternative Market Leveraged Equities with HIGH fees.

RYMKX

Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,170 Alternative Leveraged Equities funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYMKX vs DNCGX

22% FI Score
  • dncgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs JPHF

22% FI Score
  • jphf
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Multialternative

JPMorgan Diversified Alternative ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Multialternative Other fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs EHGAX

22% FI Score
  • ehgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs FLDGX

22% FI Score
  • fldgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs JTQAX

22% FI Score
  • jtqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

John Hancock ESG International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs CRECX

22% FI Score
  • crecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs DPFAX

22% FI Score
  • dpfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs AADGX

22% FI Score
  • aadgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Aasgard Dividend Growth Small & Mid-Cap Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs BATT

22% FI Score
  • batt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs BSVSX

22% FI Score
  • bsvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Baird SmallCap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs GOPAX

22% FI Score
  • gopax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Aberdeen China A Share Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs SEGPX

22% FI Score
  • segpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs NFIAX

22% FI Score
  • nfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs OCMPX

22% FI Score
  • ocmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs ECFVX

22% FI Score
  • ecfvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs FLDOX

22% FI Score
  • fldox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs AFALX

22% FI Score
  • afalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Applied Finance Core Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYMKX vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo