Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$RYIRX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jkg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jhsc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nefrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- nlgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Strategic Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nsitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Northern Short-Intermediate Tax-Exempt Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- srjax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2035 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- avde
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Avantis International Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- awaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class A
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aymix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Century High Yield Municipal Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »