RYALX : Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Class H

RYALX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYALX

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYALX vs CASCX

18% FI Score
  • cascx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs GWSIX

18% FI Score
  • gwsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs XMPT

18% FI Score
  • xmpt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs RYAHX

18% FI Score
  • ryahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs IZSCX

18% FI Score
  • izscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Select Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs SIEAX

18% FI Score
  • sieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs GNXAX

18% FI Score
  • gnxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs HNRZX

18% FI Score
  • hnrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs EZNYX

18% FI Score
  • eznyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs HCMKX

18% FI Score
  • hcmkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Income Plus Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs RGSCX

18% FI Score
  • rgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs MINAX

18% FI Score
  • minax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Madison International Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs GMACX

18% FI Score
  • gmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Diversified Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs VRECX

18% FI Score
  • vrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs FWSHX

18% FI Score
  • fwshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Western Short Duration High Yield Credit Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs SZGCX

18% FI Score
  • szgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

DWS ESG Global Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs RSGFX

18% FI Score
  • rsgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory RS Select Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs RYRLX

18% FI Score
  • ryrlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo