RYALX : Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Class H

RYALX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYALX

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYALX vs ACEVX

21% FI Score
  • acevx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs GCE

21% FI Score
  • gce
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Claymore CEF GS Connect ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs BDCS

21% FI Score
  • bdcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

UBS ETRACS Linked to the Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs FFEU

21% FI Score
  • ffeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs CRIEX

21% FI Score
  • criex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

CRM All Cap Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs SCCUX

21% FI Score
  • sccux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs SEMRX

21% FI Score
  • semrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Semper Short Duration Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs TCSHX

21% FI Score
  • tcshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs BFSAX

21% FI Score
  • bfsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

BFS Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs AHSAX

21% FI Score
  • ahsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Alger Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs PZVSX

21% FI Score
  • pzvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Pzena Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs ATPAX

21% FI Score
  • atpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs NBRAX

21% FI Score
  • nbrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs BFONX

21% FI Score
  • bfonx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Biondo Focus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs DHQIX

21% FI Score
  • dhqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Day Hagan Logix Smart Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs DMO

21% FI Score
  • dmo
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Mortgage Defined Opportunity Fund Inc.

Expenses: 3.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs LPFCX

21% FI Score
  • lpfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYALX vs HSSCX

21% FI Score
  • hsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Emerald Banking and Finance Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo