Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$RYAIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 42 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- psnnx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund I-3
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- pssax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- gssfx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Gotham Short Strategies Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryurx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryuhx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryarx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- psscx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- dxssx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bear 2X Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- pbrix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Federated Prudent Bear Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »