Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$RYACX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vallx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Value Line Larger Companies Focused Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vmacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wfggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wfqvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2045 Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- wlcgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wmmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wtmvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jemdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jicax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan Intrepid Sustainable Equity Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »