RWM : ProShares Short Russell2000

RWM is a Alternative Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RWM vs BAEGX

23% FI Score
  • baegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ORDNX

23% FI Score
  • ordnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

North Square Oak Ridge Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs OLEM

23% FI Score
  • olem
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Pure Beta Crude Oil ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs OFINX

23% FI Score
  • ofinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs MYCCX

23% FI Score
  • myccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay MacKay U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs BGLCX

23% FI Score
  • bglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs MAFIX

23% FI Score
  • mafix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs MBNYX

23% FI Score
  • mbnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs RAAIX

23% FI Score
  • raaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund I

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs PNYCX

23% FI Score
  • pnycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ECHSX

22% FI Score
  • echsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs PDREX

22% FI Score
  • pdrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs PFDOX

22% FI Score
  • pfdox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs EQCHX

22% FI Score
  • eqchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs ESHAX

22% FI Score
  • eshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs PHSCX

22% FI Score
  • phscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs EWECX

22% FI Score
  • ewecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs NAFOX

22% FI Score
  • nafox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Oregon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs FAUS

22% FI Score
  • faus
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs GOPAX

22% FI Score
  • gopax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Aberdeen China A Share Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo