RWGV : Direxion Russell 1000 Growth Over Value ETF

RWGV is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with LOW fees.

RWGV

Direxion Russell 1000 Growth Over Value ETF

FI Score

48 /100

Diversification Rating

7 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RWGV vs JBLGX

49% FI Score
  • jblgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs FCHPX

49% FI Score
  • fchpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2023 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs JPEU

49% FI Score
  • jpeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

JPMorgan Diversified Return Europe Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs TOBYX

49% FI Score
  • tobyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Active Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs HFYSX

49% FI Score
  • hfysx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs UAGNX

49% FI Score
  • uagnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

USAA Government Securities Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs NWCPX

49% FI Score
  • nwcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Nationwide Core Plus Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs HLEMX

49% FI Score
  • hlemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs JO

49% FI Score
  • jo
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath Series B Bloomberg Coffee Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs OGBCX

49% FI Score
  • ogbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs OGINX

49% FI Score
  • oginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs PABAX

49% FI Score
  • pabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs USCRX

49% FI Score
  • uscrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs OCGCX

49% FI Score
  • ocgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs OPSIX

49% FI Score
  • opsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs ABRZX

49% FI Score
  • abrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs ANGLX

49% FI Score
  • anglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGV vs ASLAX

49% FI Score
  • aslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo