RSSCX : Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C

RSSCX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

RSSCX

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C

FI Score

34 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RSSCX vs AGLCX

32% FI Score
  • aglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Century Focused Global Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs CSRCX

32% FI Score
  • csrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs PQIZX

32% FI Score
  • pqizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs SSGMX

32% FI Score
  • ssgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

State Street Defensive Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs MWOCX

32% FI Score
  • mwocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs TMUIX

32% FI Score
  • tmuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs GLVCX

32% FI Score
  • glvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs AGLOX

32% FI Score
  • aglox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ariel Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs GXSCX

32% FI Score
  • gxscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs DVFAX

32% FI Score
  • dvfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs SGIFX

32% FI Score
  • sgifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs RAPAX

31% FI Score
  • rapax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs HGXAX

31% FI Score
  • hgxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs GICPX

31% FI Score
  • gicpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs LPEIX

31% FI Score
  • lpeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs GMCIX

31% FI Score
  • gmcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LMCG Global MultiCap Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs FHESX

31% FI Score
  • fhesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs FIYY

31% FI Score
  • fiyy
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN B

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RSSCX vs HMANX

31% FI Score
  • hmanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Horizon Multi-Asset Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo