Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Touchstone Dynamic Global Allocation Fund C
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Climate Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Centerstone Investors Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund® Investor Class
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map