Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$RGHYX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mndax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
MFS New Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rapix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nmiax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pnocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pwjax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- rmoax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
RiverFront Asset Allocation Moderate Class A
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- qgrnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rnlc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
First Trust Large Cap US Equity Select ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryarx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »