RFAP : First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

RFAP is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific Stock with MODERATE fees.

RFAP

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

FI Score

25 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RFAP vs JSVTX

21% FI Score
  • jsvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs SAOCX

21% FI Score
  • saocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs IHFAX

21% FI Score
  • ihfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Integrity High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs LPFCX

21% FI Score
  • lpfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs INSIX

21% FI Score
  • insix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs TSFAX

21% FI Score
  • tsfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs PBD

21% FI Score
  • pbd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs SVTIX

21% FI Score
  • svtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Symons Value Institutional Fund Class II

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs GCE

21% FI Score
  • gce
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Claymore CEF GS Connect ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs ECGOX

21% FI Score
  • ecgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs JLGAX

21% FI Score
  • jlgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

JAG Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs TIOAX

21% FI Score
  • tioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Transamerica Inflation Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NEFHX

21% FI Score
  • nefhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs FSMHX

21% FI Score
  • fsmhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NEMUX

21% FI Score
  • nemux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nebraska Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NESGX

21% FI Score
  • nesgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NNINX

21% FI Score
  • nninx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NRBCX

21% FI Score
  • nrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo