RFAP : First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

RFAP is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific Stock with MODERATE fees.

RFAP

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

FI Score

25 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RFAP vs MIDZX

24% FI Score
  • midzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS ESG Core Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs MSSLX

24% FI Score
  • msslx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs COBYX

24% FI Score
  • cobyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Cook & Bynum Fund

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs PVIVX

24% FI Score
  • pvivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Paradigm Micro-Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs CPER

24% FI Score
  • cper
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States Copper Index Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs PYICX

24% FI Score
  • pyicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs CSOAX

24% FI Score
  • csoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs RYCQX

24% FI Score
  • rycqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs SUVBX

24% FI Score
  • suvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs TSLCX

24% FI Score
  • tslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Transamerica Small Cap Value C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs SLCGX

24% FI Score
  • slcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs SSCDX

24% FI Score
  • sscdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs SSVSX

24% FI Score
  • ssvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory Special Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs DGBCX

24% FI Score
  • dgbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs YXI

24% FI Score
  • yxi
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs DVECX

24% FI Score
  • dvecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Delaware Select Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs EACPX

24% FI Score
  • eacpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs EBSAX

24% FI Score
  • ebsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs EQAIX

24% FI Score
  • eqaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Aspect Core Diversified Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs ETADX

24% FI Score
  • etadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo