QTLNX : AQR TM Large Cap Multi-Style Fund Class N

QTLNX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

QTLNX

AQR TM Large Cap Multi-Style Fund Class N

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QTLNX vs FNGD

29% FI Score
  • fngd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

MicroSectors FANG+ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs FPXE

29% FI Score
  • fpxe
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs FSAHX

29% FI Score
  • fsahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Fidelity® Short Duration High Income Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs FTGC

29% FI Score
  • ftgc
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs FXC

29% FI Score
  • fxc
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • Single Currency

Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Single Currency Money Market fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs SIRCX

29% FI Score
  • sircx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs GESIX

29% FI Score
  • gesix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Equity Select Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs GTAMX

29% FI Score
  • gtamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2040 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs GTAQX

29% FI Score
  • gtaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2045 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs GUTEX

29% FI Score
  • gutex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Victory Tax-Exempt Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs HFKCX

29% FI Score
  • hfkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs HMJCX

29% FI Score
  • hmjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs ICWIX

29% FI Score
  • icwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs IDMIX

29% FI Score
  • idmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs JAQIX

29% FI Score
  • jaqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Janus Henderson Asia Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs JIFIX

29% FI Score
  • jifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Janus Henderson International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs JOAMX

29% FI Score
  • joamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs JPHCX

29% FI Score
  • jphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs KBWD

29% FI Score
  • kbwd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QTLNX vs LGH

29% FI Score
  • lgh
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo