Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$QILGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- precx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- usmyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pbqfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adcvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Core Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rycox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- nwzlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvfrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wbgsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
William Blair Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »