Diversification Rating
1 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$QDIV Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- claix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cwgfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eildx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmbsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bhyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock High Yield Bond Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fytkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Income Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- apohx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
American Century Short Duration Inflation Protection Bond Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mstix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MainStay MacKay Short Term Municipal Fund I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gigb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ltxfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class F1
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- imtb
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- srjax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2035 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- bsbsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pxh
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- mdnlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock National Municipal Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- haoyx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford International Opportunities Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- prwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »