QAT : iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

QAT is a International Stocks Market Other Region with HIGH fees.

QAT

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

FI Score

49 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Other Region funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QAT vs AUERX

10% FI Score
  • auerx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Auer Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs STPAX

10% FI Score
  • stpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs PCREX

10% FI Score
  • pcrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs MCEF

10% FI Score
  • mcef
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF

Expenses: 2.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RYVIX

10% FI Score
  • ryvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Rydex Energy Services Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs BIGTX

10% FI Score
  • bigtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

The Texas Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs HLDCX

10% FI Score
  • hldcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs ASDCX

10% FI Score
  • asdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs VHFCX

10% FI Score
  • vhfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Herzfeld Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs HIIIX

10% FI Score
  • hiiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs GTTMX

10% FI Score
  • gttmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RQIAX

10% FI Score
  • rqiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RESQ Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs YOVLX

10% FI Score
  • yovlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Yorktown Small-Cap Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs HSZCX

10% FI Score
  • hszcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Highland Small-Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RYFNX

10% FI Score
  • ryfnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Rydex Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs SUNCX

10% FI Score
  • suncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

AIG Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs HSZAX

10% FI Score
  • hszax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Highland Small-Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs GIRCX

10% FI Score
  • gircx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs International Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs SRPIX

10% FI Score
  • srpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProFunds Short Real Estate Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs GCMDX

10% FI Score
  • gcmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Local Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo