QAT : iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

QAT is a International Stocks Market Other Region with HIGH fees.

QAT

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

FI Score

49 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Other Region funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QAT vs MKNCX

10% FI Score
  • mkncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Invesco Global Market Neutral Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RCGHX

10% FI Score
  • rcghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs NHSAX

10% FI Score
  • nhsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs NGRAX

10% FI Score
  • ngrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs PGHCX

10% FI Score
  • pghcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs ACXIX

10% FI Score
  • acxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Catalyst Multi-Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs TOPTX

10% FI Score
  • toptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Tortoise Energy Evolution Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs PRKAX

10% FI Score
  • prkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

PGIM Real Estate Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs SLPIX

10% FI Score
  • slpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

ProFunds Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs MWSTX

10% FI Score
  • mwstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs SLVCX

10% FI Score
  • slvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Saratoga Large Capitalization Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs NUXIX

10% FI Score
  • nuxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Rational NuWave Enhanced Market Opportunity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs PFLWX

10% FI Score
  • pflwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiskPro® Aggressive 30+ Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs SGFFX

10% FI Score
  • sgffx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Sparrow Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RYBIX

10% FI Score
  • rybix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Basic Materials Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs CNGLX

10% FI Score
  • cnglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Commonwealth Global Fund

Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RYCKX

10% FI Score
  • ryckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs AWAY

10% FI Score
  • away
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

ETFMG Travel Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RYMZX

10% FI Score
  • rymzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Guggenheim Series Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QAT vs RYCHX

10% FI Score
  • rychx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo