Diversification Rating
7 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$PSCI Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Industrials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jcntx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan New York Tax Free Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwobx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fsbbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Federated Global Allocation Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tpfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Timothy Plan Fixed Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- msibx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- rytmx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- semcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Mid-Cap Portfolio Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wflhx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2055 Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- sgapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- exhax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series Class S
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- noicx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- tmvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
RBC Microcap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fut
- ETF
- Alternatives
- Future
ProShares Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- sirix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- gbvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
AllianzGI Retirement 2045 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- oriyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
North Square Oak Ridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- smll
- ETF
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 2X Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- souax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Beacon Sound Point Floating Rate Income Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »