Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$PRRAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vgiix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Growth And Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wbfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
William Blair Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vsmv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qgro
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- smoax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Moderate Strategy Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.31% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ppilx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Short Duration Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pplt
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- psct
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- rfg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »