Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$PRGFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pjfbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rpeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Davis Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wgfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tgcnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
TCW Select Equities Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tsnax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mscmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- thigx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Thornburg Core Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- bafax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund Advisor Shares
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gscgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Capital Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »