PRDGX : T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund

PRDGX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

PRDGX

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund

FI Score

73 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PRDGX vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs PBRCX

32% FI Score
  • pbrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 3.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs LCTAX

32% FI Score
  • lctax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs EKHAX

32% FI Score
  • ekhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs NIICX

32% FI Score
  • niicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs CSGCX

32% FI Score
  • csgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Calvert Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs UGAZ

32% FI Score
  • ugaz
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

VelocityShares 3x Long Natural Gas ETN Linked to the S&P GSCI Natural Gas Index ER

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs CSRCX

32% FI Score
  • csrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs BAEMX

32% FI Score
  • baemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BMO LGM Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs BACSX

32% FI Score
  • bacsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs BACAX

32% FI Score
  • bacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Investor A Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs ICHKX

32% FI Score
  • ichkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs ICDAX

32% FI Score
  • icdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Ivy Pzena International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs LNOIX

32% FI Score
  • lnoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs AWPAX

32% FI Score
  • awpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs ATTCX

32% FI Score
  • attcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice In Retirement Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs ASNAX

32% FI Score
  • asnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs HWAAX

32% FI Score
  • hwaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs EENAX

32% FI Score
  • eenax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Columbia Global Energy and Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo