Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$PLBEX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- exeyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Manning & Napier Equity Series Class S
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- eagcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aqeix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gxxcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen U.S. Multi-Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- iwirx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guinness Atkinson⢠Global Innovators Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gallx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- odgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
North Square Oak Ridge Disciplined Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- bdafx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Baron Durable Advantage Fund Retail Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rdlcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »