PID : Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF

PID is a International Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

PID

Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,471 International Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PID vs COHOX

43% FI Score
  • cohox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Coho Relative Value Equity Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PID vs STSEX

43% FI Score
  • stsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock Exchange Portfolio BlackRock Shares

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PID vs RCTIX

43% FI Score
  • rctix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare PID vs STMCX

43% FI Score
  • stmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PID vs ABLAX

43% FI Score
  • ablax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PID vs RMIAX

43% FI Score
  • rmiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RiverFront Asset Allocation Moderate Class Investor

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PID vs DZZ

43% FI Score
  • dzz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

DB Gold Double Short ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare PID vs ESGYX

43% FI Score
  • esgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PID vs FACEX

43% FI Score
  • facex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Frost Growth Equity Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PID vs AAINX

43% FI Score
  • aainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare PID vs AAAGX

43% FI Score
  • aaagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PID vs SGGDX

43% FI Score
  • sggdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

First Eagle Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PID vs JHMT

43% FI Score
  • jhmt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

John Hancock Multifactor Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PID vs MBAAX

43% FI Score
  • mbaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PID vs OOSNX

42% FI Score
  • oosnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PID vs JSACX

42% FI Score
  • jsacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2045 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PID vs MVGAX

42% FI Score
  • mvgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PID vs OLCAX

42% FI Score
  • olcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PID vs ASBCX

42% FI Score
  • asbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America® Class C

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PID vs RINF

42% FI Score
  • rinf
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo