Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
8 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
Invesco International Small Company Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
Lazard International Equity Value Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Integrity High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Transamerica Inflation Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Nebraska Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class T
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map