PFGRX : Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund Class R

PFGRX is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

PFGRX

Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund Class R

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PFGRX vs EHGAX

22% FI Score
  • ehgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs EPGFX

22% FI Score
  • epgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs EPVIX

22% FI Score
  • epvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs GTNDX

22% FI Score
  • gtndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs KSMUX

22% FI Score
  • ksmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Kansas Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs JOLIX

22% FI Score
  • jolix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs IGNAX

22% FI Score
  • ignax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Ivy Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs AFLEX

22% FI Score
  • aflex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs IREAX

22% FI Score
  • ireax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs MALTX

22% FI Score
  • maltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

BlackRock Latin America Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs HCMEX

22% FI Score
  • hcmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Income Plus Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs MDGRX

22% FI Score
  • mdgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs GLNAX

22% FI Score
  • glnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs JPHF

22% FI Score
  • jphf
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Multialternative

JPMorgan Diversified Alternative ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Multialternative Other fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs HQBCX

22% FI Score
  • hqbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs LZSMX

22% FI Score
  • lzsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs LVLAX

22% FI Score
  • lvlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Low Volatility Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs NITCX

22% FI Score
  • nitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Narragansett Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PFGRX vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo