PAWZ : ProShares Pet Care ETF

PAWZ is a Allocation Market Other with LOW fees.

PAWZ

ProShares Pet Care ETF

FI Score

45 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PAWZ vs FFEU

21% FI Score
  • ffeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs FTICX

21% FI Score
  • fticx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

DWS Communications Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs EISIX

21% FI Score
  • eisix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs SVTIX

21% FI Score
  • svtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Symons Value Institutional Fund Class II

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs RSIVX

21% FI Score
  • rsivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RiverPark Strategic Income Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs ORSIX

21% FI Score
  • orsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

North Square Oak Ridge Dynamic Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs TSFAX

21% FI Score
  • tsfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs PZVSX

21% FI Score
  • pzvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Pzena Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs NCBVX

21% FI Score
  • ncbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs DEUR

21% FI Score
  • deur
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. EUR Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs IEGCX

21% FI Score
  • iegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco International Small Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs WFECX

21% FI Score
  • wfecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Diversified International Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs INSIX

21% FI Score
  • insix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs BDCS

21% FI Score
  • bdcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

UBS ETRACS Linked to the Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs ADVIX

21% FI Score
  • advix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Vaughan Nelson International Small Cap Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs NBRAX

21% FI Score
  • nbrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs HDCAX

21% FI Score
  • hdcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rational Equity Armor Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PAWZ vs NUIAX

21% FI Score
  • nuiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nuveen Santa Barbara International Dividend Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo