Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$PADIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ioezx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
ICON Equity Income Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- sbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Touchstone Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pccfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- etnmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- rpccx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Capital Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pbcfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class B
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pcbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wgcfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- usrax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Horizon Defensive Multi-Factor Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »