Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$PACBX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- aabpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Beacon Balanced Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ffsg
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dbozx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund - Class Z
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fbabx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AIG Active Allocation Fund Class B
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- igtax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Transamerica Dynamic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bcapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hbafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Rational Strategic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ucagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bcmpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »