OUSM : O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

OUSM is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

OUSM

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

1 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OUSM vs SAOCX

21% FI Score
  • saocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs IHFAX

21% FI Score
  • ihfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Integrity High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs LPFCX

21% FI Score
  • lpfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PBD

21% FI Score
  • pbd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs FFEU

21% FI Score
  • ffeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs GCE

21% FI Score
  • gce
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Claymore CEF GS Connect ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ECGOX

21% FI Score
  • ecgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs TGRCX

21% FI Score
  • tgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs TIOAX

21% FI Score
  • tioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Transamerica Inflation Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NEFHX

21% FI Score
  • nefhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs FSMHX

21% FI Score
  • fsmhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NEMUX

21% FI Score
  • nemux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nebraska Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NNINX

21% FI Score
  • nninx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs NRBCX

21% FI Score
  • nrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs JOLTX

21% FI Score
  • joltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs OEMNX

21% FI Score
  • oemnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs WAESX

21% FI Score
  • waesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ABICX

21% FI Score
  • abicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AB International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ADVIX

21% FI Score
  • advix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Vaughan Nelson International Small Cap Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo