OUSM : O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

OUSM is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

OUSM

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

1 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OUSM vs AIVOX

32% FI Score
  • aivox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

American Century International Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AIWCX

32% FI Score
  • aiwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ADOAX

32% FI Score
  • adoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ADOCX

32% FI Score
  • adocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ANYCX

32% FI Score
  • anycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs APINX

32% FI Score
  • apinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AMG Managers Pictet International Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs APPLX

32% FI Score
  • applx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Appleseed Fund Investor Share

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AREEX

32% FI Score
  • areex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

American Century Real Estate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ARFMX

32% FI Score
  • arfmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ARNCX

32% FI Score
  • arncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2020 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ASNAX

32% FI Score
  • asnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs ATTCX

32% FI Score
  • attcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice In Retirement Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs AWPAX

32% FI Score
  • awpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BACAX

32% FI Score
  • bacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Investor A Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BACSX

32% FI Score
  • bacsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BAEMX

32% FI Score
  • baemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BMO LGM Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PBRCX

32% FI Score
  • pbrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 3.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BGRSX

32% FI Score
  • bgrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo