OUSM : O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

OUSM is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

OUSM

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

1 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OUSM vs PMZAX

35% FI Score
  • pmzax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BMAIX

35% FI Score
  • bmaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital Maryland Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs BRESX

35% FI Score
  • bresx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock International Dividend Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PELAX

35% FI Score
  • pelax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PEFCX

35% FI Score
  • pefcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs CAEIX

35% FI Score
  • caeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs CBON

35% FI Score
  • cbon
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PFUAX

35% FI Score
  • pfuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PGIRX

35% FI Score
  • pgirx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs CFSTX

35% FI Score
  • cfstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Commerce Short Term Government Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs PGSBX

35% FI Score
  • pgsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs CIHIX

35% FI Score
  • cihix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen International High Dividend Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs COLNX

35% FI Score
  • colnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Strategic New York Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs COM

35% FI Score
  • com
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs CONAX

35% FI Score
  • conax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia U.S. Social Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs CRSCX

35% FI Score
  • crscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs RYVLX

35% FI Score
  • ryvlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs SDMCX

35% FI Score
  • sdmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs SEMPX

35% FI Score
  • sempx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Semper MBS Total Return Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSM vs SLX

35% FI Score
  • slx
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck Vectors Steel ETF

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo