OUSA : O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF

OUSA is a US Stocks Market Large Value with LOW fees.

OUSA

O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF

FI Score

53 /100

Diversification Rating

2 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OUSA vs RYREX

  • ryrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Rydex Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs RYFCX

  • ryfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Rydex Financial Services Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs RYMEX

  • rymex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Rydex Commodities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs EMBCX

  • embcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs ICTRX

  • ictrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Industrials Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs AFBIX

  • afbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Access Flex Bear High Yield Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs ASFFX

  • asffx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Arrow Dynamic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs ATYIX

  • atyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ascendant Tactical Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs BMPIX

  • bmpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OUSA vs SPPIX

  • sppix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProFunds Short Precious Metals Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo